Citation-anchored · refreshed quarterly

Agent Framework Licenses Compared

MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD-3, fair-code, SaaS — what you can and can't do per framework license.

TL;DR

MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD-3, fair-code, SaaS — what you can and can't do per framework license. Each row links to the vendor's own published documentation; we cite their stated capabilities and pricing rather than editorialising. See methodology for sourcing rules.

NameVendorKindLicenseBest for
AgentsBooksAgentsBooksOS / runtimeSaaSservice-firm operators running fleets
LangGraphLangChainlibraryMITstateful workflows; LangChain shops
CrewAICrewAI Inc.libraryMITbusiness workflow automation
AutoGenMicrosoft ResearchlibraryMITdebate / decision systems
OpenAI Assistants APIOpenAIAPIproprietaryOpenAI-only agentic apps
Claude Agent SDKAnthropicSDKMITClaude-centric agent stacks
n8nn8n GmbHworkflow / no-codefair-codeops automations + glue
Zapier AgentsZapierno-codeSaaSnon-engineering teams

Highlighted row = AgentsBooks. Comparison cells reflect each vendor's own published claims, accessed 2026-05-07. Rows are not editorialised.

Sources cited

  1. Independent comparison surveys — agent frameworks 2026. https://pecollective.com/blog/ai-agent-frameworks-compared/ — accessed 2026-05-07
  2. AgentsBooks — agentsbooks.com. https://agentsbooks.com/ — accessed 2026-05-07